🔗 Share this article

The count of guaranteed seats for Māori representatives on NZ councils is set to be cut by more than half, following a divisive legislative amendment that required local governments to submit the fate of hard-won Indigenous wards to a popular referendum.

Historical Context on Indigenous Representation

Māori wards, which may have multiple elected officials depending on local population numbers, were created in 2001 to give Indigenous voters the choice to vote for a guaranteed Indigenous council member in local and regional authorities. Originally, councils were only able to create a Māori ward by initially putting it to a community referendum in their region. Communities often devoted considerable time generating community backing and pushing their local governments to establish Māori wards.

Legislative Shifts and Administrative Decisions

To remedy the issue, the previous Labour government allowed municipal authorities to set up a Māori ward without initially mandating them to put it to a public vote.

However, this year, the current administration reversed the change, stating local residents should decide whether to introduce Indigenous representation.

Voting Outcomes

The coalition’s law change mandated councils that had created a electoral district under Labour’s rules to conduct decisive public votes concurrently with the municipal polls, which concluded on October 11. Out of 42 local governments participating in the referendum, 17 voted to retain their wards, and 25 to abolish theirs – revealing numerous areas opposed to guaranteed Māori representation.

These outcomes provided “a crucial move in restoring local democratic control.”

Critics nevertheless have criticised the new policy as “racist” and “anti-Māori”. After assuming power, the current administration has implemented extensive reversals to policies designed to enhance Indigenous welfare and political inclusion. Officials has said it wants to terminate “race-based” approaches, and asserts it is dedicated to enhancing results for Māori and all New Zealanders.

Geographical Splits

The results of the public votes were divided down urban-rural lines – six of the seven urban centers mandated to hold referendums backed Māori wards, while countryside areas skewed heavily towards disestablishing them.

“It’s a real shame for the Māori wards that had only just come in – they’re just beginning to find their footing.”

Voter Turnout and Criticism

This year’s local government elections registered the lowest voter turnout in 36 years, with under one-third of citizens casting a vote, leading to demands for reform.

The process had been “a farce”.

Differential Standards

Councils are able to create different wards – including rural wards – without first requiring a community ballot. The different conditions applied to Māori wards suggested the administration was singling out Māori representation.

“Ultimately, they were unsuccessful. Many communities have expressed strong opposition.”

This remark referred to the 17 regions that chose to retain their wards.