🔗 Share this article

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “complete double standards” for campaigning against anti-smoking regulations in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Documents seen by journalists dispatched by the company’s subsidiary in Zambia to the African officials demands plans to ban tobacco advertising and sponsorship to be abandoned or delayed.

The corporation is pursuing amendments to a draft bill that include decreasing the proposed size of graphic health warnings on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on flavoured tobacco products, and reduced sanctions for any firms breaking the new laws.

Anti-tobacco campaigner response

“If I was a politician, I would say that they enable the defense of the British people and continue the mortality of the Zambian people,” said the health advocate.

Over seven thousand citizens a year succumb to cigarette-linked health conditions, according to World Health Organization estimates.

The campaigner stated the letter was known to have been circulated to multiple official agencies and was in circulating through community advocacy networks.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

It comes amid expanded apprehension about business sector influence with health policies. In recent weeks, global health authorities issued a warning that the tobacco industry was escalating campaigns to dilute worldwide restrictions.

“We see evidence of business advocacy globally. Manufacturer hallmarks are on postponed duty hikes in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN summit conference,” said Jorge Alday.

Likely impacts

“Should anti-smoking legislation doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the price could be paid in human lives who might otherwise quit smoking.”

The tobacco control bill going through Zambia’s parliament includes regulations surpassing UK legislation by including provisions for e-cigarettes, and requiring that graphic health warnings cover seventy-five percent of product packaging.

Corporate counter-proposals

Via documentation, the company recommends this be lowered to 30% or 50% “according to global suggested parameters”, deferred for no less than one year after the law is enacted.

The WHO specifically advises a alert needs to encompass at least fifty percent of the product container front “and aim to cover as much of the main visible surfaces as possible”. Within Britain, warnings must cover nearly two-thirds of a packet’s front and back.

Scented product controversy

The corporation requests the removal of broad restrictions on flavoured tobacco products, arguing that it would push consumers toward “illicitly sold” products. The company proposes prohibiting a smaller list of “flavours based on desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. Each flavored smoking item have been prohibited in Britain since 2020.

The proposed legislation suggests penalties for various offences “ranging from a percentage of annual turnover to a decade in prison”.

Company justification

Via documentation, the corporate leader of British American Tobacco Zambia says the corporation is focused on good corporate behaviour” and “endorses the aims of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the associated health impact” but asserts that “some regulations can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Critic response

The campaigner argued the corporation's recommended amendments would “dilute these regulations so much that the necessary effect for it to produce permanent improvement in society will not be achieved”.

The fact that multiple comparable regulations existed in the UK, where the corporation is based, was “complete contradiction”, he stated.

“We live in a international community. If I plant tobacco in my property and gather the crop and distribute the goods – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my neighbour’s children do … to profit individually and all the future family lines while my community's youth are succumbing … is in itself complete moral bankruptcy.”

Tobacco control legislation in the UK or elsewhere had failed to shutter businesses, the advocate mentioned. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Standard business position

The corporate communicator stated: “BAT Zambia conducts its business in compliance with relevant national regulations. Further, the firm contributes in the nation's lawmaking procedures in line with the suitable systems which provide for interested party involvement in policymaking.”

The firm positioned itself as “not against rules”, the spokesperson stated, noting that young individuals should be shielded from obtaining cigarettes and nicotine.

“We advocate for progressive regulation to accomplish desired community wellbeing objectives, while accepting the variety of rights and obligations on businesses, users and involved parties,” the representative explained, adding that the company's suggestions “mirror the circumstances of the Zambian market and smoking product business, which involves growing volumes of illicit trade”.

The nation's ministry of economic activities and commercial operations was solicited for statement.