🔗 Share this article

Recently, Battlefield Studios introduced a new game mode titled Relaxed Breakthrough. To put it simply, this option resembles the regular Breakthrough format but includes a few key changes:

• Every squad includes just 8 human participants, with the remaining filled by AI-controlled opponents.
• Actions performed by human gamers award full XP, while AI activities provide lower rewards.
• Just a pair of maps are available: Siege of Cairo and Empire State.
• Features like Dogtags, accolades, and stat tracking have been turned off.

In short, this mode lives up to its title: it offers a laid-back take of Breakthrough. At face value, one could assume there's nothing wrong, as it gives additional choices for players looking for alternative ways to enjoy the title. However, if video games has shown one thing, it's that not everyone will be happy. Which is to say, a lot of BF6 fans are mad.

Community Reactions: From Fury to Praise

"Gamers prefer human opponents. Don't repeat the errors of your competitors," states a response to the mode reveal. "Truly disappointing concept," says a different user. At the same time, on the Battlefield subreddit, one user remarks, "I have no idea where we are headed with this title," and someone else lists everything they consider to be broken in Battlefield 6: "Fix bugs, address drone issues, fix IVF rockets, adjust aiming after sprinting, improve hit detection. We don't need this AI-heavy playlist."

However, amid the criticism, some gamers sharing how much they're liking the recent addition. "It's very fun to warm up, real players keep it from being a total farmfest but it's very relaxed," reads a forum post. "The community fails to see that there are gamers who actually go outside and can't play this title all the time. Let them find a middle ground," adds a different comment. One reply on Twitter clarifies that as they're "a battledad with limited time, this is perfect for me," and someone else praises the mode for "avoiding intense competition."

Constructive Concerns and Community Input

Despite the support, there are valid points to criticize the new mode. Some users have highlighted that it could increase queue times more extended for other modes because of the large amount of playlists currently available. Similarly, some areas often face mostly bots in the current modes. It also seems somewhat counterintuitive that the mode won't start without a required amount of real players, despite it focuses mostly on combat against bots.

Finally, one of the biggest grievances is that Battlefield Portal was promised to offer complete rewards, including AI matches, but that got canned when they tried to eliminate bot farms from the system. So Casual Breakthrough feels like the community compromising halfway, as per forum feedback. A different user labels this addition as the developers "dropping the ball significantly, I experienced great enjoyment in the first couple of days, why did they feel the need to adjust it?"

Looking Ahead: Adjustments Occur?

Should the development team has demonstrated something to date with Battlefield 6, it is that they're listening and responding to player input. Assignments being too difficult got fixed rapidly, just like the specific battle pass objectives. It is likely that, if their data indicates this recent mode is underperforming to their expectations, they will not hesitate to change it again.